CAUTION: In the past 12 months the Court of Appeals has REVERSED the issuance of two separate Harassment Restraining Orders (HRO) based on Due Process violation(s). Namely, failure to provide respondent the opportunity to: (1) cross- examine the petitioner or the petitioner’s witnesses; and/or (2) the right to present witnesses on respondent’s behalf, or in the alternative, to make an offer of proof regarding the testimony of witnesses.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
 | Alan F. Pendleton (F… on WHAT EVERY JUDGE & ATTORNE… |
| Alan F. Pendleton (F… on WHAT EVERY JUDGE & ATTORNE… |
 | John anderes on WHAT EVERY JUDGE & ATTORNE… |
 | petemaxwell15 on Urine Drug Testing: The Risk o… |
| petemaxwell15 on Minnesota’s 2014 Domesti… |
Apps for any screen
A great WordPress.com site
The California lawyer’s trusted source for fast, relevant, and practical legal guidance.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Inspiration and tools for better blogging from WordPress.com
The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
more
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
MINNESOTA LEGAL TRAINING & EDUCATION BLOG 