WHEN RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DEFENDANT’S PRE-ARREST, PRE-MIRANDA SILENCE (FOR USE IN THE STATE’S CASE-IN-CHIEF) THERE ARE 4 PRIMARY QUESTIONS THE COURT MUST ANSWER.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
-
Join 1,071 other subscribers
LEGAL RESEARCH LIBRARY
- Legal Search Engines
- Minnesota State Statutes
- Minnesota Administrative Rules
- Minnesota Automobile Insurance Arbitration Rules
- Minnesota Court Rules:
- Minnesota Civil Commitment Act
- Minnesota Court Records Search (MNCIS)
- Minnesota Court Forms
- Minnesota Judicial Branch (public website)
- Minnesota “Payables” List
- Minnesota State Bar Association (MSBA)
- Minnesota State Constitution
- Shumaker’s Rulings on Evidence (Judge’s Edition); An Evidentiary Manual for Minnesota Trial Judges and Attorneys
- United States Constitution
Training & Trial Manuals
FEATURED BOOK
Irving Younger’s 10 Commandments Of Cross Examination
-
Recent Posts
- United States Supreme Court Series: 45 of the most significant decisions (3 of 45 – Worcester v. Georgia) August 22, 2022
- United States Supreme Court Series: 45 of the most significant decisions (2 of 45 – Gibbons v. Ogden) August 1, 2022
- United States Supreme Court Series: 45 of the most significant decisions (1 of 45 – Marbury v. Madison) July 22, 2022
- 16 Quotes on Finding the Humor in Life July 19, 2022
- Three Rules For Attorneys To Live By July 14, 2022
Top Posts & Pages
- BAIL HEARINGS IN FELONY STRANGULATION CASES - SEVEN MEDICAL-PHYSIOLOGICAL FACTS EVERY JUDGE AND ATTORNEY SHOULD KNOW (18-01)
- Judge Advises Defendant "You Have a Constitutional Right to be a Dumb-Ass." Welcome to the Funniest and Filthiest Court Transcript of all time. The Following is an Excellent Example of a Judge Doing Almost Everything Wrong When Dealing with a Disruptive Defendant. (16-05)
- ADMISSIBILITY OF BUSINESS RECORDS - FIVE QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED - Rule 803(6) (14-02)
Irving Younger’s 10 Commandments Of Cross Examination
MINNESOTA LEGAL TRAINING & EDUCATION BLOG 
I found this very interesting and useful in my son’s current situation whereby his ex fiance has made a significant amount of money in online business and digital content and instead of just being fair and reasonable about the proceeds she opted for the criminal approach under the guidance of some would be criminals (would be because they would be if they actually possessed the parts to follow through)
At any rate I didn’t think Minnesota bench lawyers would rely on a blog post created by WordPress from their training I believe they learned allot of this stuff in University but at any rate I thoroughly enjoyed it and what uncanny date periods it seems it takes a village to fight a harmless father. Harmless at first vut becoming more and more vengeful as the days pass and this ridiculousness continues
LikeLike