Tag Archives: law

Minnesota’s New Uniform Firearm-Surrender Law: What Judges and Attorneys Need to Know

Dear Colleagues:

Minnesota has enacted a significant overhaul of its firearm-surrender procedures. The new legislation, contained in Chapter 75, is long and complex—26 pages and more than 11,500 words—and is designed to establish a uniform statewide procedure for the surrender, transfer, documentation, storage, compliance, and return of firearms.

Because the law became effective August 1, 2026, judges and attorneys must understand these procedures now. Its impact extends across criminal, family, juvenile-protection, and pretrial-release proceedings and affects every major stakeholder in the justice system.

The attached Training Update, reduces this lengthy legislation to a practical, approximately 15-20 minute read. It explains:

  • the five statutory categories that may trigger a firearm-transfer order;
  • the difference between ordinary transfer, immediate law-enforcement possession, and forfeiture;
  • the permissible transfer options and special rules governing third-party transfers;
  • proof-of-compliance requirements and the mandatory compliance hearing;
  • enforcement, storage, return, and use-immunity provisions; and
  • the specific responsibilities of judges and attorneys at each stage of the process.

This is more than a technical revision. It substantially changes existing firearm-surrender practice and creates new responsibilities, deadlines, and potential consequences. I strongly encourage every judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, family-law attorney, and other legal-system professionals whose work may involve firearm restrictions to take the time to review this update.

The link to the update is attached below.

👉 Click here for a print-ready copy of Training Update 26-12:

👉 Click here to access Update 26-12 on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Resource Center.

Please also consider forwarding it to colleagues who would benefit from understanding Minnesota’s new uniform procedure.

Alan F. Pendleton
Of Counsel, Martine Law Firm
Director of Mentorship and Education
Former District Court Judge
alan@xmartinelaw.com
763-498-1508

New Marijuana Law Training Update: What Every Minnesota Judge and Attorney Should Know. (25-04)

Dear Colleagues,

Minnesota’s marijuana laws have undergone sweeping changes—and the legal consequences for misapplying them can be severe. In our latest Martine Law Training Update (25-4), we unpack the most pressing and misunderstood issue in current search-and-seizure law:

Does the smell of marijuana alone still give officers probable cause to search a vehicle?
The Minnesota Supreme Court says no — and the Legislature has now codified that ruling into law.


This update dives into:

  1. The core holding of State v. Torgerson and how it reshapes warrantless vehicle search analysis
  2. Ten key facts from the 2023 Marijuana Reform Act
  3. How M.S. 169A.36 makes even trace THC in a vehicle a prosecutable offense—including legal hemp edibles and medical cannabis

Whether you practice criminal law, handle suppression issues, or just want to avoid costly legal missteps, this update is essential reading. Judges, prosecutors, and defense counsel alike must understand where the constitutional lines are drawn and how the marijuana reform laws interact with existing vehicle and drug statutes.

Click here for a print-ready copy of Martine Law Training Update 2025-4


NOTE: This training update is also available on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website. While visiting, you can subscribe to receive notifications of new updates. Please share this training update with colleagues, clerks, or anyone who would benefit from staying current on Minnesota law and litigation strategy.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base approaching 3,500 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our firm’s commitment to the belief that legal education is the soul of the judiciary.