WEAPONS AND HAZARDOUS EXHIBITS IN THE COURTROOM POLICY (14-03)

SAMPLE POLICY: The enclosed sample policy is designed to cover most trial situations in which a firearm, weapon or hazardous material is somehow involved. By requiring the party intending to use or display the weapon (or hazardous material) to notify the court prior to trial, the presiding judge can modify this policy to address any circumstance not specifically covered by this policy.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-3

ADMISSIBILITY OF BUSINESS RECORDS – FIVE QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED – Rule 803(6) (14-02)

DURING TRIAL: When A Party Offers Documents Into Evidence Under The Business Records Hearsay Exception (rule 803(6)) What Five Questions Should The Court Answer Before Ruling on Admissibility? (This assumes the documents are, in fact, business records, are relevant and not privileged.)

CLICK LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-2

ORDERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT “SUA SPONTE” THE MORNING OF TRIAL 14-01

QUESTION: Prior to commencement of a civil trial, during discussion between the court and counsel, the court determines that there are no material issues of fact for the court or jury to decide. Does the trial court have inherent authority to grant summary judgment on its own motion the day of trial without notice to the parties as required by Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 56.03?

CLICK LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-1

 

 

WAIVER OF EXTRADITION ADVISORY (13-01)

QUESTION: What procedure should a judge follow when a defendant, charged with being a “Fugitive from Justice,” makes a Rule 5 first appearance on an in-custody or bail calendar? This Update also includes a script that judges can follow in-court and covers procedures that apply in Habeas Corpus hearings…..

CLICK LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton13.01-Waiver_of_Extradition_Advisory

“JUDICIAL LANDMINES” 20 COMMON MISTAKES EVERY JUDGE SHOULD AVOID (13-15)

WHAT IS A JUDICIAL LANDMINE? Judicial Landmines are common judicial mistakes or oversights that create a high likelihood of triggering an appeal. These judicial oversights tend to reoccur with every new generation of judges. Most of these mistakes occur as a result of judicial omission or failing to make a proper record. The following is a summary list of the 20 most common reoccurring Judicial Landmines.

CLICK LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 13-15

 

RESTITUTION vs FINES – WHAT GETS PAID FIRST – NEW RULE (13-14)

QUESTION: If a defendant’s sentence includes both a fine and restitution, and if defendant makes one or more payments to court administration, what is payment first credited to – restitution or the fine?

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

https://pendletonupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/judicial-training-update-13-14.docx

FIVE IMMIGRATION FACTS EVERY JUDGE AND ATTORNEY SHOULD KNOW AND ONE SUGGESTED BEST PRACTICE (13-13) (OLD VERSION – SEE 13-13 DATED MARCH 7, 2014 FOR UPDATED VERSION)

There are many conviction and sentencing factors that can have a dramatic impact on the deportation status of a non-citizen defendant. This update covers five of the most common problems that every judge and attorney should be aware of.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

https://pendletonupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/pendleton13-13-five_immigration_facts.pdf

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS – TEN BASIC RULES EVERY JUDGE SHOULD FOLLOW (13-12)

Other than a spouse or family member, there are few people judges spend more time with than their court reporters. The personal and professional relationship between a judge and their court reporter is extremely unique. In addition to being responsible for maintaining the official court record, court reporters are also privy to highly confidential and sensitive material. Court reporters are highly trained dedicated professionals and deserve to be treated as such. The following is a list of ten (10) personal and professional practices to help new judges develop a relationship with their court reporter that is based on mutual trust and respect.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton13.12-Official_Court_Reporters

Admissibility of Electronic Evidence “Focus on Authenticity” (13-11)

QUESTION: During trial, judges are often asked to rule on the admissibility of electronic evidence. This unique form of evidence typically takes the form of: 1) Website Data;  2) Social Network Communications and Postings; 3) Email;  4) Text Messages, and 5) Computer Generated Documents. What Four-Step legal analysis should the court follow in ruling on the admissibility of Electronic Evidence?

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton13.11-Admissibility_of_Electronic_Evidence

GUARDIAN AD LITEM (GAL) REPORTS AND THE FOOL-PROOF HEARSAY TEST (13-08) [OUTDATED SEE NEW VERSION AT 20-01]

QUESTION: GAL reports usually contain “out of court statements” made by various third parties including the child(ren) at issue, such as “I saw daddy punch mommy in the face.” What legal analysis should the court follow if an attorney objects to the admissibility of such statements on hearsay grounds?

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO READ MORE [This update is outdated. See new version at 20-01, dated March 31,2020]

Pendleton13.08-GAL_Reports-The_Fool-Proof_Hearsay_Test