QUESTION: STATE FILES A MOTION-IN-LIMINE SEEKING ADMISSION OF SPREIGL EVIDENCE. WHAT 5 STEP PROCESS MUST THE COURT FOLLOW IN REACHING A DECISION?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
QUESTION: STATE FILES A MOTION-IN-LIMINE SEEKING ADMISSION OF SPREIGL EVIDENCE. WHAT 5 STEP PROCESS MUST THE COURT FOLLOW IN REACHING A DECISION?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in EVIDENCE, Spriegl - 5 Step Process
Tagged EVIDENCE, motion in limine, Spriegl
QUESTION: What is the appropriate judicial response if Defendant complains about his assigned Public Defender and demands a substitute attorney? What basic rules and procedures apply?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Pendleton12.03-Defendant’s_Demand_for_Substitute_Public_Defender
Posted in CRIMINAL PRETRIAL, Substitute Public Defender
Tagged Public Defender, substitute
This Update answers ten basic questions that every judge and attorney should know about civil judgments.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
QUESTION: You Are Presiding Over A High Conflict Family Law Case With Numerous Parenting Time Disputes. You Would Like To Utilize The Services of A “Parenting Time Expeditor” or “Parenting Consultant” to Help Resolve those Disputes. What Is The Difference?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Pendleton12.01-Parenting_Time_Expeditor_vs_Parenting_Consultant
ATTACHED IS A CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL CHECKLIST THAT JUDGES CAN USE TO DISCUSS PROCEDURAL, SUBSTANTIVE AND EVIDENTIARY ISSUES WITH ATTORNEYS IN CHAMBERS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF TRIAL.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
WHEN RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DEFENDANT’S PRE-ARREST, PRE-MIRANDA SILENCE (FOR USE IN THE STATE’S CASE-IN-CHIEF) THERE ARE 4 PRIMARY QUESTIONS THE COURT MUST ANSWER.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in EVIDENCE, Pre-Arrest Silence
Tagged arrests, Pre-Arrest Silence, Pre-Miranda Silence
The Minnesota Supreme Court Recently Issued A Decision Of 1st Impression On The Use Of “UNSPECIFIED FELONIES” Which Significantly Impacts The Use Of Prior Convictions For Impeachment Purposes. This Training Update Replaces Update #10-19, Dated October 25, 2010. The Updated Section Is On Page 2, Paragraph #3, Labeled “NEW RULE – UNSPECIFIED FELONIES”. State v. Hill, AO9-1947, August 24, 2011.
QUESTION: Prior To Trial The State Files A Motion-In-Limine Seeking To Impeach Defendant (Should He Decide To Testify) With Several Prior Felony Convictions, All Occurring Within The Past 10 Years And None Constituting A “Crime Of Dishonesty Or False Statement”. What Balancing Test Must The Court Apply And What 5 Specific Findings Must The Court Make (On The Record) To Properly Rule?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Pendleton11.14-Impeachment-Prior_Felony_Convictions
QUESTION: WHILE IN CHAMBERS YOU ARE ASKED TO RULE ON A REQUEST FOR AN “EX-PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER”. WHAT TWO QUESTIONS MUST THE COURT ANSWER IN ORDER TO PROPERLY RULE?
CLICK ON LINK TO READ MORE
Posted in CIVIL PROCEDURE, TRO - Dahlberg Factors
Tagged Dahlberg, temporary restraining order, TRO
This Update Is Designed As A “Quick Judicial Reference Guide” On When And Under What Circumstances The 36-Hour And 48-Hour Rules Apply Following The Warrantless Arrest And Continued Detention Of An Adult Suspect.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 36 hour rule, 48 hour rule, CRIMINAL PRETRIAL, detention, Warrantless arrest
LAW and TECHNOLOGY - Ralph Losey © 2006-2026
Apps for any screen
A great WordPress.com site
The California lawyer’s trusted source for fast, relevant, and practical legal guidance.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Inspiration and tools for better blogging from WordPress.com
The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
more
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar