WHEN RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DEFENDANT’S PRE-ARREST, PRE-MIRANDA SILENCE (FOR USE IN THE STATE’S CASE-IN-CHIEF) THERE ARE 4 PRIMARY QUESTIONS THE COURT MUST ANSWER.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
WHEN RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DEFENDANT’S PRE-ARREST, PRE-MIRANDA SILENCE (FOR USE IN THE STATE’S CASE-IN-CHIEF) THERE ARE 4 PRIMARY QUESTIONS THE COURT MUST ANSWER.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in EVIDENCE, Pre-Arrest Silence
Tagged arrests, Pre-Arrest Silence, Pre-Miranda Silence
The Minnesota Supreme Court Recently Issued A Decision Of 1st Impression On The Use Of “UNSPECIFIED FELONIES” Which Significantly Impacts The Use Of Prior Convictions For Impeachment Purposes. This Training Update Replaces Update #10-19, Dated October 25, 2010. The Updated Section Is On Page 2, Paragraph #3, Labeled “NEW RULE – UNSPECIFIED FELONIES”. State v. Hill, AO9-1947, August 24, 2011.
QUESTION: Prior To Trial The State Files A Motion-In-Limine Seeking To Impeach Defendant (Should He Decide To Testify) With Several Prior Felony Convictions, All Occurring Within The Past 10 Years And None Constituting A “Crime Of Dishonesty Or False Statement”. What Balancing Test Must The Court Apply And What 5 Specific Findings Must The Court Make (On The Record) To Properly Rule?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Pendleton11.14-Impeachment-Prior_Felony_Convictions
QUESTION: WHILE IN CHAMBERS YOU ARE ASKED TO RULE ON A REQUEST FOR AN “EX-PARTE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER”. WHAT TWO QUESTIONS MUST THE COURT ANSWER IN ORDER TO PROPERLY RULE?
CLICK ON LINK TO READ MORE
Posted in CIVIL PROCEDURE, TRO - Dahlberg Factors
Tagged Dahlberg, temporary restraining order, TRO
This Update Is Designed As A “Quick Judicial Reference Guide” On When And Under What Circumstances The 36-Hour And 48-Hour Rules Apply Following The Warrantless Arrest And Continued Detention Of An Adult Suspect.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
QUESTION: What Are the Most Common Judicial Triggers for Appeals and Remands? Do you ever wonder what your colleagues around the state are doing (or not doing) that tend to statistically trigger appeals and remands? Regardless of merit, certain judicial actions carry a high probability of triggering an appeal, a remand, or both? This Update addresses the most common judicial appeal triggers.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in 10 Common Triggers, APPEALS and/or REMANDS
Tagged appeal triggers, CRIMINAL PRETRIAL, Judicial mistakes, remands
Unless You Came From The Criminal Division Of A County Attorneys Office, Most Judges Have Little Or No Prior Grand Jury Experience. At Some Point During Your Judicial Career You Will Be Asked To Orientate And Supervise A Grand Jury Proceeding. This Update Will Tell You Everything You Need To Know – Almost.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in CRIMINAL PRETRIAL, Grand Jury - 10 Basic Rules
Tagged Grand Jury, instructions
Following A Probation Violation Hearing (Misd, Gross Misd Or Felony), If The Court Determines There Is Clear And Convincing Evidence That A Condition Of Probation Has Been Violated (Or If The Probationer Admits The Violation), What 3 Specific Findings MUST The Court Make Before Defendant’s Probation Can Be Revoked And The Sentence Executed?
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Posted in Austin Factors, PROBATION
Tagged Austin, PROBATION, Revocations, violations
Eviction Laws And Procedure Are Creations Of Statute And At Times Can Be Complex And Confusing. Although Hennepin And Ramsey County Have Judges/Referees That Specialize In This Area, For Much Of The State, Judges Preside Over Eviction Cases With Little Or No Prior Experience. The Following 10 Basic Rules Apply To All Landlord-Initiated Eviction Actions, Not Tenant-Initiated Remedy Actions.
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE (Replaced by 14-22)
THERE ARE A FEW COMMON JUDICIAL MISTAKES THAT JUDGES TEND TO REPEAT YEAR AFTER YEAR, RESULTING IN A LARGE NUMBER OF APPEALS. ONE OF THE MOST COMMON OF THESE MISTAKES IS FAILURE TO OBTAIN A “PERSONAL WAIVER” OF THE RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL WHEN A DEFENDANT STIPULATES TO AN ELEMENT OF THE CHARGED OFFENSE. A SIMPLE MISTAKE TO CORRECT!
CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE
Pendleton11.05-Judicial_Mistake_Number_1-When_Defendants_Stipulate_to_Element_of_Offense
LAW and TECHNOLOGY - Ralph Losey © 2006-2025
Apps for any screen
A great WordPress.com site
The California lawyer’s trusted source for fast, relevant, and practical legal guidance.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Inspiration and tools for better blogging from WordPress.com
The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
more
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar
Dedicated to the Training & Education of the Minnesota Bench and Bar