Category Archives: 2025 Martine Law Firm

Martine Law Training Update – 2025 Recap Issue Part-One

Dear Colleagues, in the fast-paced worlds of criminal and family law, staying current with recent legal developments, courtroom strategies, and practical tools is critical to effective advocacy. With hundreds of new attorneys, judges, and legal professionals joining our training distribution list every month, many may have missed important earlier updates.

To make access easier, this recap summarizes the last seven Martine Law Training Updates (25-2 through 25-8). Each update is available in full on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website. The most recent five appear on the home page. Older updates are organized in a subject matter index, table of contents, and searchable keyword index. Please explore these resources and share them with others who may benefit.


1. Training Update 25-2 (April 27, 2025)

Title: Hearsay v. Non-Hearsay: The Fool-Proof Hearsay Test
This update introduces a 3-step analytical test for determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay. It emphasizes starting with the correct legal question — is the statement even hearsay? — before jumping to exceptions. It also outlines the six categories of Rule 801(d) non-hearsay statements and provides practical examples.
Why it matters: Avoiding hearsay errors at trial is a critical skill for litigators. This update gives attorneys a simple but powerful tool to analyze any out-of-court statement.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-2]


2. Training Update 25-3 (June 4, 2025)

Title: Crawford v. Washington and the Hearsay Testimonial Rule
This follow-up to Update 25-2 explains the “testimonial hearsay” rule under Crawford, Davis, and Krasky. It provides a four-part flowchart, primary purpose checklist, and sample motion to exclude testimonial hearsay.
Why it matters: Criminal defense attorneys must recognize and challenge testimonial hearsay violations to protect the client’s Sixth Amendment rights and preserve issues for appeal.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-3]


3. Training Update 25-4 (June 22, 2025)

Title: Marijuana Odor & Warrantless Vehicle Searches
This update breaks down the Minnesota Supreme Court’s ruling in State v. Torgerson (2023), and the new statute (M.S. 626.223) clarifying that the smell of marijuana alone does not justify a vehicle search. Also included: a practical guide to the 2023 Marijuana Reform Act and the “Open Cannabis Container” law (M.S. 169A.36).
Why it matters: Knowing what cannabis-related conduct is lawful vs. criminal is essential to properly challenge searches and suppress evidence.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-4]


4. Training Update 25-5 (July 7, 2025)

Title: Family Law Motions – Ten Basic Rules
This foundational update outlines ten core rules of family law motion practice, including service deadlines, scope of affidavits, oral testimony requests, GAL appointments, and unsworn attachments. It also highlights the new 2024 statutory requirement for expedited parenting time hearings under M.S. 518.131, Subd. 11.
Why it matters: These rules are often overlooked, but failure to follow them can result in canceled hearings, denied motions, or even professional embarrassment.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-5]


5. Training Update 25-6 (July 14, 2025)

Title: Dimler Amendment – Keeping Speeding Tickets Off the Driving Record
This update explains the application of the “Dimler Amendment” (M.S. 171.12, Subd. 6) which prevents certain low-level speeding violations from appearing on a person’s DPS driving record. It also covers practical strategies for asking for reduced speeds and amending tickets.
Why it matters: Understanding Dimler can protect clients from increased insurance rates, and gives defense attorneys negotiating leverage in traffic court.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-6]


6. Training Update 25-7 (July 21, 2025)

Title: Alford Pleas: A Three-Step Guide for Making a Valid Record
This update provides a complete procedural guide and sample script for accepting an Alford plea, including key questions to ask and how to make an appeal-proof record under State v. Theis and Goulette.
Why it matters: Improperly accepted Alford pleas can be reversed on appeal. This update ensures both prosecutors and defense attorneys make a clean, defensible record.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-7]


7. Training Update 25-8 (July 28, 2025)

Title: The Power of Gratitude: Transforming the Lives and Practices of Attorneys and Judges
Departing from the usual legal topics, this update addresses the mental health crisis in the legal profession and introduces gratitude as a science-backed practice to build resilience, reduce burnout, and foster better professional relationships.
Why it matters: Lawyers and judges in high-conflict fields like family and criminal law face extreme stress. This update provides a vital tool for long-term sustainability in the profession.
[Click here to read Training Update 25-8]


If you missed any of the above updates, you can also access them at:
📚 Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website

Want to search for past topics? Use the search bar, the Table of Contents, or the Subject Matter Index.
New to our list? Welcome aboard — and thank you for your commitment to excellence in legal practice.

If you find this recap update helpful, please consider forwarding it to colleagues or staff who may benefit from it. And if you haven’t already, visit the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website to subscribe and receive future updates directly.

Special thanks to the Martine Law attorneys and Paralegals who generously contributed their insight and expertise to all past training updates.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base approaching 4000 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our firm’s commitment to the belief that legal education is the soul of the judiciary.

Warm regards,
Alan F. Pendleton
Of Counsel, Martine Law Firm
Director of Mentorship and Education
Former District Court Judge

The Power of Gratitude: Transforming the Lives of Attorneys and Judges

Dear Colleagues,

Start 2026 with Purpose — and Neuroscience.

In the high-stakes world of legal practice, mental health challenges are more than just common — they’re statistically alarming. But emerging neuroscience shows that one simple mindset shift can make a measurable difference.

This Training Update explores The Power of Gratitude — not as a soft sentiment, but as a science-backed, data-driven strategy to boost well-being, reduce stress, and rewire the brain for resilience and focus. For attorneys and judges navigating high-conflict environments, gratitude may be the most underutilized legal tool in your arsenal.

What better way to begin 2026 than by exploring how a small daily practice can lead to sustainable personal and professional transformation?

👉 Click here to read the full print-ready update.

If you find this update helpful, please consider forwarding it to colleagues or staff who may benefit. And if you haven’t already, visit the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website to subscribe and receive future updates directly.

Special thanks to Martine Law Paralegals Autumn Amick and Brian Louis for generously contributing their insight and expertise to this update.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base exceeding 3,500 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our firm’s commitment to the belief that legal education is the soul of the judiciary.

Warm regards,
Alan F. Pendleton
Of Counsel, Martine Law Firm
Director of Mentorship and Education
Former District Court Judge
alan@xmartinelaw.com

Alford Plea of Guilty (Defendant Denies Guilt): A Three-Step Process to “Appeal-Proof” the Plea

Three Steps to Making a Proper Record

Dear Colleagues,

Attached is my latest Martine Law Training Update, focused on a topic that continues to trip up even experienced attorneys and judges: the Alford plea.

Most of us rarely encounter these pleas—and that’s precisely when mistakes happen. A sloppy record can easily lead to reversal on appeal. This update does more than educate. It provides a clear, 3-step process that doubles as an in-court script to ensure that every Alford plea is entered properly, thoroughly, and—with confidence—appeal-proof.

Whether you’re a trial judge or trial attorney, this update gives you everything you need to handle an Alford plea correctly the next time it appears on your calendar.

Click to read the full training update here:
👉 Martine Law Training Update 25-7: Alford Pleas of Guilty

As always, please feel free to forward this update to colleagues who may benefit from it. Thank you for continuing to make legal education part of your practice.

Special thanks to Martine Law attorneys Luke McClure and Kalen Best for generously contributing their insight and expertise to this update.


NOTE: This training update is also available on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website. While visiting, you can subscribe to receive notifications of new updates. Please share this training update with colleagues, clerks, or anyone who would benefit from staying current on Minnesota law and litigation strategy.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base exceeding 3,500 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our commitment to the belief that legal education is the soul of the judiciary.

Warm regards,
Alan F. Pendleton
Of Counsel, Martine Law Firm
Director of Mentorship and Education
Former District Court Judge

How to Keep a Speeding Ticket off your Minnesota Driving Record: The Dimler Amendment (M.S. 171.12, Subd 6)

Most attorneys know that even a single speeding ticket can spike insurance premiums, jeopardize a commercial license, or contribute to a driver’s license suspension depending on the individual’s past driving history. But few attorneys—and even fewer clients—know that a little-known Minnesota statute, the “Dimler Amendment,” can prevent many minor speeding convictions from ever appearing on a driver’s official record.

In this Training Update, we take a deep dive into M.S. 171.12, subd. 6, which quietly shields certain low-level speeding violations in 55 and 60 mph zones from being reported on a person’s Department of Public Safety (DPS) driving record. When used correctly, it can protect your clients’ insurance rates, help avoid license sanctions, and preserve clean records for job or court purposes.

This is a practical tool every criminal and family law attorney should have in their legal toolkit. Whether you’re negotiating a minor traffic ticket for a client, helping a friend or family member, or even dealing with your own citation—knowledge of the Dimler Amendment is power.

This update explains:

  • Which violations qualify and which don’t;
  • How and when to ask for a speed reduction;
  • What role judges, prosecutors, and officers each play;
  • What to do if you’re charged with a non-speeding infraction.

Read the full training update here:
👉 Click to Read Martine Law Training Update 25-6 – The Dimler Amendment

Special thanks to Martine Law attorneys Tyler Martin and Abbey Rostamo for generously contributing their insight and expertise to this update.


NOTE: This training update is also available on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website. While visiting, you can subscribe to receive notifications of new updates. Please share this training update with colleagues, clerks, or anyone who would benefit from staying current on Minnesota law and litigation strategy.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base exceeding 3,500 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our firm’s commitment to the belief that legal education is the soul of the judiciary.

Top 10 Family Law Motion Rules Every Lawyer Must Know

New Martine Law Training Update on Family Law Motions – Ten Basic Rules Every Practitioner Should Know:


Family court motion practice is full of procedural landmines—miss a filing deadline, cite the wrong statute, or attach unsworn documents, and your argument may never be heard. Our latest Training Update cuts through the confusion with a clear and practical guide to the Ten Basic Rules of Family Law Motions.

Whether you’re filing for temporary relief, responding to a contempt motion, or preparing affidavits, this update will help you avoid the most common mistakes and improve your courtroom effectiveness.

📘 Highlights include:

  • How to avoid fatal service errors
  • What qualifies as a valid affidavit (and what doesn’t)
  • When courts must prioritize parenting time disputes under the new 2024 law
  • Why unsworn attachments can sink your motion
  • And much more.

Click here to read the full update: MLTU Family Law Motions – Ten Basic Rules (25-5).
Stay sharp, stay current—your clients (and the court) will thank you.

Special thanks to Martine Family Law attorneys Rhiley O’Rourke and Nicole Geffre for generously contributing their insight and expertise to this update.


NOTE: This training update is also available on the Minnesota Judicial Training and Education Website. While visiting, you can subscribe to receive notifications of new updates. Please share this training update with colleagues, clerks, or anyone who would benefit from staying current on Minnesota law and litigation strategy.


Martine Law Training Updates will continue to focus on key areas of litigation, including Criminal and Family Law, Evidence and Procedure, and Trial Advocacy. With a subscriber base exceeding 3,500 attorneys, judges, and legal professionals, these updates reflect our firm’s commitment to the belief that legal education is the heart of the judiciary.