Author Archives: Alan F. Pendleton, "Of Counsel" Martine Law Firm, Director of Mentorship & Education, Former District Court Judge

Evidentiary Rulings – Preserving the Record: 5 Rules Every Judge (and attorney) Must Know (15-02)

Lack_EvidenceUpdate Focus:  You are upset at your judge’s evidentiary ruling(s). You are convinced the courts legal analysis is seriously flawed and you believe you could win on appeal. Preserving the court record is one of the fundamental duties of all judges and attorneys. However, winning an appeal by arguing evidentiary error is exceedingly hard to do. This Update will focus on the 5 most important rules that attorneys and judges must follow in order to preserve an evidentiary ruling for appeal.

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO READ MORE:

PendletonUpdate15-02

 

 

Minnesota’s New Expungement Law – A Step-by-Step Guide for Judges & Attorneys (15-01)

HISTORIC NEW LEGISLATION: If the significance of a new law is measured by the benefit it brinExpungement1gs to the public and the anticipated impact it will have on the entire judicial system, then Minnesota’s new Expungement “second chance” law is nothing short of historic.

This new Expungement law will give countless qualified Minnesotans a second chance to reclaim their lives without the stigma attached to having a criminal record. For example:

  1. In a 2012 survey, the Society for Human Resource Management, found that 87 percent of employers run criminal background checks.
  2. And it is not just felonies or violent crimes that stand in the way of a job offer being extended to a qualified candidate. Twenty Six percent of employers in this survey stated that they would NOT extend an offer to someone with a nonviolent misdemeanor conviction.
  3. In addition, the impact of a misdemeanor conviction is compounded for individuals licensed by the Department of Human Services because certain misdemeanor convictions will result in a seven-year disqualification.

However, the road to expungement for a petitioner is not guaranteed. There are burdens to meet, hurdles to overcome and ultimately the presiding judge, after applying a 12 part test, must be convinced that the benefit to the petitioner outweighs the detriment to the public and public safety. Under this new law, only the truly worthy will qualify.

The attached Judicial Training Update provides judges, attorneys and the general public with a Step-by-Step Guide to Minnesota’s new “second chance” expungement law.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

 PendletonUpdate15-01

 

 

DISTRICT COURT REVIEW OF ARBITRATION AWARDS – One Common Mistake Judges Can Easily Fix (14-24)

PROBLEM – CONFIRM arbitration vs. VACATE AWARD: One problem the Court of Appeals sees on a regular basis involves the District Court review of Arbitration Awards. Typically one side moves to “vacate” the award and the other side files a separate motion to “confirm” the award. According to the Court of Appeals, in many cases where the court denies the motion to vacate, judges frequently neglect to rule on the motion to confirm the award (or in absence of a motion, fails to sua sponte confirm the award). An appeal can only be taken from a judgment that “confirms” the arbitration award. An order that denies a motion to vacate (but fails to “confirm” the award), leaves the case “hanging” and no appeal can be taken.

This one page  Update states the problem,  identifies the applicable statute, applies a solution in the form of a Judicial Best Practice and provides Court Administrators with advice on how to avoid the problem.

TO READ MORE CLICK ON LINK BELOW:

PendletonUpdate14-24

 

 

 

Domestic Violence: “Safe at Home” Program – Important Facts Every Judge Should Know (14-23)

SAFE AT HOME PROGRAM: Minnesota is one of 39 states to enact “address confidential” legislation forSafe at Home victims of domestic violence. In 2007, M.S. Chapter 5B established the “Safe at Home” Program which is operated through the Office of the Secretary of State.

The “Safe at Home” Program allows victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking who fear for their safety to enroll in an address confidentiality program.  The core tenet of the program is the non-disclosure of a crime victim’s residence. However, Safe at Home is not just for victims of domestic violence and stalking. The program can include anyone who fears for their safety (law enforcement, etc.).

This Training Update will answer 3 questions:

1) What is the Minnesota “Safe at Home” program?

2) How does it benefit victims of domestic violence, and

3) Under what circumstances can the District Court order disclosure of a victim’s confidential physical address? 

TO READ MORE CLICK THE LINK BELOW:

PendletonUpdate14-23

 

IMMIGRATION: 5 Immigration Facts Every Judge and Attorney Should Know (13-13) (Includes March 7, 2014 amendment)

There are many conviction and sentencing factors that can have a dramatic impact on the deportation status of a non-citizen defendant. This update covers five of the most common problems that every judge and attorney should be aware of and one suggested best practice. The lastimmigration.law page of the update includes references to several immigration services available to judges, attorneys and the general public.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

 PendletonUpdate13-13