Category Archives: TRIAL ISSUES

PRO-SE DEFENDANTS AT TRIAL: Everything that Judges (and attorneys) Need to Know (15-03)

pro se lincoln quotePro Se Defendants: All judges eventually find themselves confronted with a defendant who requests or demands the right to represent himself/herself at trial.

This could occur for a number of reasons; perhaps defendant holds strong anti-government beliefs (i.e. Posse Comitatus), defendant fails or refuses to retain private counsel after the court has denied a request for the public defender, or defendant is simply overconfident and believes he/she doesn’t need an attorney.

Although defendants have a constitutional right to represent themselves at trial, exercising that right creates a host of constitutional and procedural pitfalls that judges must be prepared to overcome. This update will address the following 6 key topics:

❶ Three General Principles That Always Apply;

❷ Applying the Correct Legal Analysis & Making Two Specific Findings;

❸ Appointment of Standby Counsel – Ten Facts You Need to Know;

❹ Two Additional Ways a Defendant Can Waive the Right to Counsel;

❺ What if Defendant is Mentally Ill?

❻ Judge’s Authority to Regulate the Trial with a Pro Se Defendant.

TO READ THE FULL UPDATE CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK:

PendletonUpdate 15-03

Evidentiary Rulings – Preserving the Record: 5 Rules Every Judge (and attorney) Must Know (15-02)

Lack_EvidenceUpdate Focus:  You are upset at your judge’s evidentiary ruling(s). You are convinced the courts legal analysis is seriously flawed and you believe you could win on appeal. Preserving the court record is one of the fundamental duties of all judges and attorneys. However, winning an appeal by arguing evidentiary error is exceedingly hard to do. This Update will focus on the 5 most important rules that attorneys and judges must follow in order to preserve an evidentiary ruling for appeal.

CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO READ MORE:

PendletonUpdate15-02

 

 

CIVIL JURY TRIALS: 10 TRIAL ISSUES JUDGES SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR (14-19)

Most judges tend tCIVIL.LAWo preside over criminal jury trials more frequently than they do civil jury trials. Thus, it is not surprising that many judges are more familiar with and comfortable handling criminal jury trial issues than they are civil jury trial issues. In the world of civil jury trials there are certain legal issues that tend to occur with a fair amount of frequency. Because most civil trial attorneys deal with these issues regularly, trial judges must be prepared to address these same issues, sometimes on very short notice. This update addresses ten common civil jury trial issues that every judge should be prepared for.

PendletonUpdate14-19

 

CROSS-EXAMINATION: Judicial Checklist For Use In Mentoring Attorneys (14-08)

CROSS EXAMINATION: Most lawyers do a good job in their opening statements, direct examinations, and closing argument, but never learn the art of cross-examination. Cross-examination has been called the ultimate test of the litigator’s skill. Judges, because of their training and experience, are in a unique position to mentor and guide young trial attorneys in many aspects of effective trial advocacy.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-8

 

COURTROOM INTERPRETERS – 6 PROCEDURAL STEPS TO FOLLOW (14-05)

STEP ONE: Know the Rules and Statutory Authority;

STEP TWO: Determine the Need For an Interpreter;

STEP THREE: An Interpreter Should be Qualified as an Expert and Administered an Oath. Rule of Evidence 604;

STEP FOUR – OPTIONAL: To Assure That All Participants Understand the Role of the Interpreter, the Court Should Consider Reading the Following Language at the Start of a Court or Jury Trial;

STEP 5: Interpreter Jury Instruction and Use of Two Interpreters;

STEP 6: Seven Judicial Tips on How to Maximize the Use and Effectiveness of a Courtroom Interpreter.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-5

WEAPONS AND HAZARDOUS EXHIBITS IN THE COURTROOM POLICY (14-03)

SAMPLE POLICY: The enclosed sample policy is designed to cover most trial situations in which a firearm, weapon or hazardous material is somehow involved. By requiring the party intending to use or display the weapon (or hazardous material) to notify the court prior to trial, the presiding judge can modify this policy to address any circumstance not specifically covered by this policy.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-3

ORDERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT “SUA SPONTE” THE MORNING OF TRIAL 14-01

QUESTION: Prior to commencement of a civil trial, during discussion between the court and counsel, the court determines that there are no material issues of fact for the court or jury to decide. Does the trial court have inherent authority to grant summary judgment on its own motion the day of trial without notice to the parties as required by Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 56.03?

CLICK LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton Update 14-1

 

 

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS – TEN BASIC RULES EVERY JUDGE SHOULD FOLLOW (13-12)

Other than a spouse or family member, there are few people judges spend more time with than their court reporters. The personal and professional relationship between a judge and their court reporter is extremely unique. In addition to being responsible for maintaining the official court record, court reporters are also privy to highly confidential and sensitive material. Court reporters are highly trained dedicated professionals and deserve to be treated as such. The following is a list of ten (10) personal and professional practices to help new judges develop a relationship with their court reporter that is based on mutual trust and respect.

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

Pendleton13.12-Official_Court_Reporters

Ordering Defendants to Wear Restraints During Trial (13-05)

QUESTION: Under what circumstances can the court order a defendant to wear restraints (e.g. leg restraint not visible to the jury, etc.) during trial and what nine (9) factors should the court consider in reaching a decision?

CLICK ON LINK BELOW TO READ MORE

PendletonUpdate13-05

Jury Selection “Batson” Challenge (13-02)

QUESTION: You’re In The Middle Of Jury Selection When One Party Raises A “Batson” Challenge. What Three-Step Analysis Must You Follow To Properly Rule On The Challenge? Does “Batson” Prohibit Both Racial and Gender Discrimination?

CLICK BELOW LINK TO READ MORE

Pendleton13.02 Batson Challenge-replaces 10-10